|
Post by turbomagnus on May 7, 2007 17:56:58 GMT -5
Or more specifically, a scenario based on the concept of What If The Punisher had succeeded in killing Spider-Man in his first appearance in ASM #129. (as seen in the aforementioned issue of What If?)
Players; two to three players. One side is made up of the Sinister Syndicate figures (Brotherhood and Hidden can also be used, if you so choose), the other of Marvel Knights, Avengers, X-Men and Fantastic Four - the only figure and class excluded is Spider-Man, he's considered 'dead' for this scenario - the point total is chosen by the players...
Then there's the special side - if there's three players, the third player fields a team of Punishers (only Punishers), if there's only two players, then the two players alternate moving the Punisher team.
The object of the 'good' team is to kill the Punisher team. - Because they're still heroes, they MAY attack the evil team. Standard 'last man standing' rules apply for good team victory.
The object of the 'bad' team is to kill the good team. - The bad team thinks the Punisher is on their side because he killed Spider-man, they may NOT attack the Punisher team. If the 'bad' team kills all of the good team before the good team kills the Punisher, the bad team wins.
The object of the Punisher team is to... punish (kill) the bad team. - The Punisher may NOT attack the Good team, he only Punishes the guilty. The Punisher team wins by killing the Bad team before the good team suceeds in killing the Punisher team.
What do you guys think of it as a scenario for an Attacktix game?
|
|
|
Post by Jw18 on May 12, 2007 8:18:12 GMT -5
weird yet it might work hey what about this scenario 100 pt x-men team consisting of prodder wolverine,striker wolverine,gambit,and beast VS 100 pt brotherhood team consisting of magneto, sabretooth, pyro, and mystique. Who would win?
|
|
Leumas
40 Point Leader
?????$??? ?
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by Leumas on May 12, 2007 16:33:04 GMT -5
Sounds interesting, one team going after another, simultaniously trying not to be killed by a team they can't fight, which is the same team that is being killed by the team that the first team is killing...... it seems so simple until you try to explain it in one sentance . Never the less, very cool idea.
|
|