|
|
Post by Cona Chris on Jan 15, 2007 12:28:42 GMT -5
1) On Daredevil, does his effect count if the attack was used as part of an attackback? Example, Electra does down and comes up white, Daredevil #1 moves in and takes out S1 Vader, so according to Daredevil's effect, that attack doesn't count... so could I move another Daredevil?
2) On Wolverine (M-9), does HE have to be the one that takes out a leader or is it anyone on his team?
3) On Wolverine (M-9), same question as #1 basically... if during an attackback, Wolverine (or anyone else) knocks down a leader, can then Wolverine move and attack?
I might be overthinking again, but I just wasn't sure if the effects are limited to your turn or not.
Anyone have any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by malform on Jan 15, 2007 13:15:17 GMT -5
1) On Daredevil, does his effect count if the attack was used as part of an attackback? Example, Electra does down and comes up white, Daredevil #1 moves in and takes out S1 Vader, so according to Daredevil's effect, that attack doesn't count... so could I move another Daredevil? 2) On Wolverine (M-9), does HE have to be the one that takes out a leader or is it anyone on his team? 3) On Wolverine (M-9), same question as #1 basically... if during an attackback, Wolverine (or anyone else) knocks down a leader, can then Wolverine move and attack? I might be overthinking again, but I just wasn't sure if the effects are limited to your turn or not. Anyone have any thoughts? Just my thoughts, but... 1) Yes, I see no reason why his effect wouldn't be in "effect" even while executing an attackback. 2) Nice loop hole. Dont know why I didnt come across this (been playing allot of marvel attacktix lately). I think that the effect was meant to convey that wolverine kills a leader, then moves again to attack someone else. But the wording doesnt specifically state that wolverine must be the leader killer.... I think we need a real ruling on this one. 3) I would still say yes. I see no reason (unless my opinion is shot down by a higher power) why an effect such as this would not still be viable in an attackback scenario. |
|
|
|
Post by Cona Chris on Jan 15, 2007 13:21:55 GMT -5
I agree with you Malform. I think the effects would work on attackbacks as well as the regular turn, and I think the effect for Wolverine means that if Wolverine kills a Leader, he gets to use his effect. That makes the most sense to me. Those will be my "House Rules"... Now if only I could stop thinking of Benny boy and cringing every time I'm about to move Daredevil  |
|
