Penguin
30 Point Warrior
????#???? ????????????? ?
Posts: 480
|
Preview
Aug 23, 2006 15:59:04 GMT -5
Post by Penguin on Aug 23, 2006 15:59:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Preview
Aug 23, 2006 20:04:08 GMT -5
Post by Radar on Aug 23, 2006 20:04:08 GMT -5
That video looks terrible, the camera man has a poor sense of perspective, is unable to focus on any one piece of information, and clearly lacks the control to get any solid film shot. That is an embarrassing piece of film. I should be ashamed I shot it. It is really hard to get a good shot through that glass.
|
|
Penguin
30 Point Warrior
????#???? ????????????? ?
Posts: 480
|
Preview
Aug 23, 2006 20:05:39 GMT -5
Post by Penguin on Aug 23, 2006 20:05:39 GMT -5
Don't be so hard on yourself.
|
|
|
Preview
Aug 24, 2006 10:05:32 GMT -5
Post by Phoenix on Aug 24, 2006 10:05:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Preview
Aug 24, 2006 10:32:07 GMT -5
Post by webhead817 on Aug 24, 2006 10:32:07 GMT -5
FOCUS! FOCUS!
|
|
|
Preview
Aug 24, 2006 14:52:32 GMT -5
Post by grievous on Aug 24, 2006 14:52:32 GMT -5
I was able to figure out what the base of Thing said. He currently has Mace Windu's power of "Stand up Mace Windu if you have another Jedi inplay". Apparently Hasbro didn't get the bases right. Also, Thing is number 18 in the set, which does NOT match Mace Windu.
|
|
|
Preview
Aug 24, 2006 16:26:25 GMT -5
Post by Joe Manzo on Aug 24, 2006 16:26:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Preview
Sept 3, 2006 17:33:53 GMT -5
Post by optimus103 on Sept 3, 2006 17:33:53 GMT -5
Is it just me or does the Marvel set seem to have a lot of strikers? AT a quick glance it seems more then half the set is strikers. That would make a good Marvel team to take out a team of Jedi knights.
|
|
greevy
30 Point Warrior
????#???? ?????????????????????????????? ?
Posts: 521
|
Preview
Sept 5, 2006 13:39:39 GMT -5
Post by greevy on Sept 5, 2006 13:39:39 GMT -5
Is it just me or does the Marvel set seem to have a lot of strikers? AT a quick glance it seems more then half the set is strikers. That would make a good Marvel team to take out a team of Jedi knights. Except that the Knight's awesomeness comes from his ten point status, from the pics I've seen of Marvel it doesn't look like any strikers have a small base/10 point quality (In other words I assumed Battle Ravage and Scourge would be TF 10 pt. Strikers but they got larger bases and are twenty points. Marvel may have more Strikers but but they may be more expensive then everyone's favorite Jedi.)
|
|
|
Preview
Sept 5, 2006 20:36:35 GMT -5
Post by thecasualoblivion on Sept 5, 2006 20:36:35 GMT -5
Is it just me or does the Marvel set seem to have a lot of strikers? AT a quick glance it seems more then half the set is strikers. That would make a good Marvel team to take out a team of Jedi knights. Except that the Knight's awesomeness comes from his ten point status, from the pics I've seen of Marvel it doesn't look like any strikers have a small base/10 point quality (In other words I assumed Battle Ravage and Scourge would be TF 10 pt. Strikers but they got larger bases and are twenty points. Marvel may have more Strikers but but they may be more expensive then everyone's favorite Jedi.) Battle Ravage got a larger base, but Scourge did not. Its a 20pt striker with a tiny base, and has 8 speed to boot. Sad that a figure that looks that cool sucks.
|
|