|
|
Post by superflytnt on Jun 11, 2007 19:18:34 GMT -5
Well, I've pretty much resigned myself to focus on the one bit for the time being - the "Attacktix Non-Sanctioned Rulebook, 1st Edition". I will be looking in the "house rules" forum and posting there for reconciliation of some and advancements of theory on others, but basically I've seen bantering and not a whole lot of concensus, hence F'yall. I'll write the article as I see fit based upon the input I receive, and if anyone wants to edit it, so be it.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyelephant on Jun 11, 2007 19:27:37 GMT -5
Posted by superflytnt on Today at 8:18pm
Well, I've pretty much resigned myself to focus on the one bit for the time being - the "Attacktix Non-Sanctioned Rulebook, 1st Edition". I will be looking in the "house rules" forum and posting there for reconciliation of some and advancements of theory on others, but basically I've seen bantering and not a whole lot of concensus, hence F'yall. I'll write the article as I see fit based upon the input I receive, and if anyone wants to edit it, so be it. |
I feel ya, man. First thing that should always be discussed is who is going to make the final wording or adjustments. |
|
Ataru
40 Point Leader
????#???? ?
Posts: 1,017
|
Post by Ataru on Jun 11, 2007 20:08:13 GMT -5
I'm willing to give it a go. I just can't seem to join, though... it keeps re-loading the same page over and over... perhaps I need someone's permission to join?
|
|
Annointed 1
30 Point Warrior
????#??? ?$????????? ?
Posts: 408
|
Post by Annointed 1 on Jun 12, 2007 8:05:39 GMT -5
I do lots of work and reviews for Master Attacktix, so I will give this a hand too. I must admit though I am a little scared as to what I am already seeing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe Manzo on Jun 12, 2007 13:23:57 GMT -5
I do lots of work and reviews for Master Attacktix, so I will give this a hand too. I must admit though I am a little scared as to what I am already seeing. Once all the framework is up, hopefully the _Masters_ can then smooth it out, attach a familiar review format and go from there. |
|
|
|
Post by superflytnt on Jun 12, 2007 15:30:07 GMT -5
I think the real problem with the Wikia(s) of the world is that there ends up being far too many chiefs and far too little indians. I think it's, generally speaking, to assign certain jobs to certain individuals, that way things get done in parallel and less ego gets in the way fo getting the jobs done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe Manzo on Jun 12, 2007 15:33:22 GMT -5
But there is always a TOP chief, that can lock/protect pages, grant higher editing access and restrict delinquent/malicious users. So once a format is in place, it can be policed.
|
|
|
|
Post by superflytnt on Jun 12, 2007 16:35:55 GMT -5
If that's the case, then I stand corrected. I just don't want to see one (or more) person(s) that think that their way is the best way to go around editing to their heart's delight while flying in the face of the community decision.
|
|
